header UrbanHonking Home
side_header
KENNETH MICHELANGELO MAXIMILLIAN
KmikeyM.com: Buy Shares!
K5M.org: Project Space
Twitter

Recent Flickr Pictures

Fine del . icio . us Hyperlinks

A Gentleman's Archives

Winning $75 on 65 or Lower

El valor sin dinero: KMIKEYM.COM

A Great Shareholder Meeting

Shareholder Meeting

Projects Update

More...



Site and Design Credits

Site Design by YACHT & Emily Johnson

KmikeyM portrait by Corey Lunn

Powered by MT 4.0

side-footer

Winning $75 on 65 or Lower

|

I have a bet set up about the critical reception of the new Indiana Jones film. My gut feeling is that the film will not be better than "pretty good." Using Metacritic as a reference point I can see that they rated The Last Crusade a 65. While still favorable, a 65 is, like The Last Crusade, a pretty forgettable film.

So my bet was that the Crystal Skull will do no better than Last Crusade. This was a $20 bet that was upped to $50 after seeing the CG effects of the first trailer. My betting opponent was very sure of himself, and we made another $20 bet, this time with the film needing to get over 70.

ij4-proj.jpg

Now I'm sitting here refreshing the Metacritic page watching the reviews come in, and the idea hits me that maybe I can predict the scores of the reviews. So I take a few films that are in the same range; films like The Bank Job, Redbelt, and Horton Hears a Who! and I look at what each critic rated that film. Some sources seem to have a clear tendency to rate high (Entertainment Weekly) while others seem a little harsher on average (Austin Chronicle).

After making some mildly educated guesses I predicted a final score of 67, two points shy of my ultimate $70 win. But Metacritic is a strange beast, and the actual published score seems to be lower than the average of all the review by a point or two. So I held out hope.

ij4-66.jpg

Right now the score is down to an agonizing 66. Just one point away. Metacritic tends to collect at least 30 reviews, and the 66 only represents 25, so the number could easily shift up or down. I guess at this point I just have to wait and hope that the Austin Chronicle, Christian Science Monitor, or the Washington Post hates it.

05/21/08 5:01 PM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish

El valor sin dinero: KMIKEYM.COM

|

I am interviewed in Sputnik Magazine (sputnik.com.mx), which I am told is like the Mexican version of Wired. I have a PDF of the article posted on K5M, El valor sin dinero: KMIKEYM.COM.

sputnik-mag.jpg

05/20/08 2:53 PM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish

A Great Shareholder Meeting

|

I want to thank everyone who attended the First Annual K5M Shareholder's Meeting. It was great to be able to all gather in one place and I look forward to the future investment and involvement of all the new people that came out. The official results of the softball game will be announced on UHAC, but I just wanted to express my thanks for the gifts and everyone's participation.

There is of course a short video:

05/19/08 4:43 PM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish

Shareholder Meeting

|

05/15/08 12:11 PM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish

Projects Update

|


05/14/08 9:50 AM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish

Spending Time in Orlando

|


05/06/08 9:17 AM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish

2008 Q1 Report

|

Just posted my first Quarterly Report for K5M. Not much action in it, as the year has been pretty quiet so far.

If you calculate the assets of K5M ($1,180.35) and compare that to the number of shares sold so far (1617) then we have established the face-value of a share to be $0.73.

The most recent trade was $1.75, which shows optimism on behalf of my shareholders.

It will be interesting to see how the value fluctuates after the auction.

05/02/08 2:15 PM | (0) Comments | Permalink

flouish
footer